State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Pinjar vs Arjun Shivnath Shinde — 689/2024
Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b),24. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAK080014302024
Filing Number
1095/2024
Filing Date
09-10-2024
Registration No
689/2024
Registration Date
09-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshitakli
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Barshitakli
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Pinjar
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Arjun Shivnath Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Barshitakli
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 05-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 26-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 24-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court of Judicial Magistrate, Barshitakli convicted the accused Arjun Shivnath Shirde under Section 6(b) of the COPTA Act 2003 for selling tobacco products within 100 yards of an educational institution. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with one day simple imprisonment, considering his poor financial condition and the bailable nature of the offense. The seized tobacco products were ordered to be confiscated, with the Investigating Officer directed to dispose of them as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court of Judicial Magistrate, Barshitakli convicted the accused Arjun Shivnath Shirde under Section 6(b) of the COPTA Act 2003 for selling tobacco products within 100 yards of an educational institution. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with one day simple imprisonment, considering his poor financial condition and the bailable nature of the offense. The seized tobacco products were ordered to be confiscated, with the Investigating Officer directed to dispose of them as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts