State of Maharashtra vs Sau.Shital Prashant Khadse Advocate - Uparwat B.P. — 346/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHAK070018022023
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
Filing Number
1536/2023
Filing Date
29-11-2023
Registration No
346/2023
Registration Date
29-11-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sau.Shital Prashant Khadse Advocate - Uparwat B.P.
Sau.Vidya Sheshrao Khandare
Sau.Sandhya Raju Rakhade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-07-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a witness statement in a theft case (FIR No. 346/2023) from Balappur Court, Akola district, Maharashtra. The complainant testified that her gold necklace (20 grams, valued at ₹1,20,000) was stolen while boarding a bus on April 25, 2023, and was later recovered from a woman wearing a pink saree and yellow blouse. The court examined both the government witness and defense arguments regarding identification of the accused, with the defense challenging the witness's credibility and ability to identify the perpetrator among multiple women present on the bus. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness statement in a theft case (FIR No. 346/2023) from Balappur Court, Akola district, Maharashtra. The complainant testified that her gold necklace (20 grams, valued at ₹1,20,000) was stolen while boarding a bus on April 25, 2023, and was later recovered from a woman wearing a pink saree and yellow blouse. The court examined both the government witness and defense arguments regarding identification of the accused, with the defense challenging the witness's credibility and ability to identify the perpetrator among multiple women present on the bus. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts