State of Maharashtra vs Sooraj Bhimrao Sirsaat Advocate - Shegokar V.H. — 190/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,511. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHAK070010982019
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
899/2019
Filing Date
04-10-2019
Registration No
190/2019
Registration Date
04-10-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Sooraj Bhimrao Sirsaat Advocate - Shegokar V.H.
Ajay Tejrao Wankhade
Adv. Shegokar V.H.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a court record from a criminal case (Case No. 190/2019) at Balapurkar Court, containing witness testimony from a security officer regarding theft of metal pipes from an ash dam facility. The witness testified about apprehending two suspects (Suraj Sirsaat and Ajay Wakhade) in possession of cut pipe pieces and a motorcycle. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged regarding inconsistencies in his statement and his identification of the accused. The court accepted the post-hearing report dated 13.02.2026, with no further directions mentioned regarding bail or case disposition in this particular testimony section. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a court record from a criminal case (Case No. 190/2019) at Balapurkar Court, containing witness testimony from a security officer regarding theft of metal pipes from an ash dam facility. The witness testified about apprehending two suspects (Suraj Sirsaat and Ajay Wakhade) in possession of cut pipe pieces and a motorcycle. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged regarding inconsistencies in his statement and his identification of the accused. The court accepted the post-hearing report dated 13.02.2026, with no further directions mentioned regarding bail or case disposition in this particular testimony section. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts