Shahala Najnin Mohammad Shakil Akhtar vs Mohammad Shakil Akhtar Abdul Khalik Advocate - Dandi C.A. — 134/2019
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHAK070006882019
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
572/2019
Filing Date
03-07-2019
Registration No
134/2019
Registration Date
03-07-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahala Najnin Mohammad Shakil Akhtar
Adv. Ingale S.T.
Respondent(s)
Mohammad Shakil Akhtar Abdul Khalik Advocate - Dandi C.A.
Abdul Khalik Abdul Kadar
Jamil B J Abdul Vahab
Najmussher Ja Abdul Vahab
Adv. Umale P.V.
Abdul Vahab Sheikh Sahab
Adv. Umale P.V.
Sahaba Shahin J Khijar Aasif
Adv. Umale P.V.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 06-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 17-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 27-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
The witness's cross-examination in this criminal case (CrPC Application No. 134/2019) reveals that the witness admitted to making false statements in her affidavit. She acknowledged that several material paragraphs in her deposition—including claims about the defendant's family background, the marriage details, and allegations of domestic violence—were fabricated and contradicted her written statement. The court recorded her admission that she had given false testimony and was committing perjury during the proceedings, dated November 26, 2024, at Baramati court under First Class Magistrate D.M. Patil. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The witness's cross-examination in this criminal case (CrPC Application No. 134/2019) reveals that the witness admitted to making false statements in her affidavit. She acknowledged that several material paragraphs in her deposition—including claims about the defendant's family background, the marriage details, and allegations of domestic violence—were fabricated and contradicted her written statement. The court recorded her admission that she had given false testimony and was committing perjury during the proceedings, dated November 26, 2024, at Baramati court under First Class Magistrate D.M. Patil. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts