State of Maharashtra vs Shrikrushna @ Ravi Nagorao Aagarkar — 93/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 23-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHAK070004612020

Filing Number

407/2020

Filing Date

03-Jul-2020

Registration No

93/2020

Registration Date

03-Jul-2020

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shrikrushna @ Ravi Nagorao Aagarkar

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  6. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  8. 21-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 21-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    This is a witness statement (government witness no. 3) recorded in a criminal case (FIR no. 93/2020) at the Balapur Court in Maharashtra. The witness, Sanjay Shaligram Vaitkar (58 years old, farmer), testified regarding scene panchnamas conducted on 14.05.2020 and seizure panchnama on 17.05.2020 related to an alleged assault incident involving Krishna Agar kar allegedly attacking the witness's brother Rajesh with a steel glass. The witness stated he could not explain certain highlighted portions of the panchnamas or clarify why specific details were recorded by police, and the court accepted his statement after cross-examination by the defense on 21.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  11. 27-Jun-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  12. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  13. 31-May-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  14. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  15. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  16. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  17. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  18. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  19. 30-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  20. 15-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  21. 21-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  22. 28-Jul-2023

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  23. 28-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  24. 02-Feb-2023

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  25. 07-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

  26. 06-May-2022

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.

  27. 10-Dec-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.

  28. 11-Aug-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.

  29. 10-May-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.

  30. 20-Feb-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.

  31. 21-Nov-2020

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.

  32. 28-Aug-2020

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.

  33. 03-Jul-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 03-Jul-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2020

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness statement (government witness no. 3) recorded in a criminal case (FIR no. 93/2020) at the Balapur Court in Maharashtra. The witness, Sanjay Shaligram Vaitkar (58 years old, farmer), testified regarding scene panchnamas conducted on 14.05.2020 and seizure panchnama on 17.05.2020 related to an alleged assault incident involving Krishna Agar kar allegedly attacking the witness's brother Rajesh with a steel glass. The witness stated he could not explain certain highlighted portions of the panchnamas or clarify why specific details were recorded by police, and the court accepted his statement after cross-examination by the defense on 21.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case