State of Maharashtra vs Shrikrushna @ Ravi Nagorao Aagarkar — 93/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHAK070004612020

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

Filing Number

407/2020

Filing Date

03-07-2020

Registration No

93/2020

Registration Date

03-07-2020

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Shrikrushna @ Ravi Nagorao Aagarkar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

30-09-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

27-06-2025
Evidence
21-07-2025
Evidence
21-07-2025
Evidence

This is a witness statement (government witness no. 3) recorded in a criminal case (FIR no. 93/2020) at the Balapur Court in Maharashtra. The witness, Sanjay Shaligram Vaitkar (58 years old, farmer), testified regarding scene panchnamas conducted on 14.05.2020 and seizure panchnama on 17.05.2020 related to an alleged assault incident involving Krishna Agar kar allegedly attacking the witness's brother Rajesh with a steel glass. The witness stated he could not explain certain highlighted portions of the panchnamas or clarify why specific details were recorded by police, and the court accepted his statement after cross-examination by the defense on 21.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness statement (government witness no. 3) recorded in a criminal case (FIR no. 93/2020) at the Balapur Court in Maharashtra. The witness, Sanjay Shaligram Vaitkar (58 years old, farmer), testified regarding scene panchnamas conducted on 14.05.2020 and seizure panchnama on 17.05.2020 related to an alleged assault incident involving Krishna Agar kar allegedly attacking the witness's brother Rajesh with a steel glass. The witness stated he could not explain certain highlighted portions of the panchnamas or clarify why specific details were recorded by police, and the court accepted his statement after cross-examination by the defense on 21.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case