State of Maharashtra vs Sk. Firoz Sk. Chand Advocate - Firoz A khan — 50/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHAK070004362018
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
383/2018
Filing Date
24-04-2018
Registration No
50/2018
Registration Date
24-04-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Sk. Firoz Sk. Chand Advocate - Firoz A khan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. Balapur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-01-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a court record documenting witness examination in a criminal case (FIR 50/2018) involving alleged cattle theft. A police officer (Assistant Police Inspector Chandrakant Sidram Mamtabade) testified about seizing 105 cattle hides and 5 salt bags (valued at ₹2,12,500) from the accused Firoz's residence, with proper panchanama (seizure document) prepared. The cross-examination challenged inconsistencies in the police procedure, including lack of chemical testing, absence of proper documentation about the recovered items' origin, and procedural irregularities in evidence handling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a court record documenting witness examination in a criminal case (FIR 50/2018) involving alleged cattle theft. A police officer (Assistant Police Inspector Chandrakant Sidram Mamtabade) testified about seizing 105 cattle hides and 5 salt bags (valued at ₹2,12,500) from the accused Firoz's residence, with proper panchanama (seizure document) prepared. The cross-examination challenged inconsistencies in the police procedure, including lack of chemical testing, absence of proper documentation about the recovered items' origin, and procedural irregularities in evidence handling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts