State of Maharashtra vs Jayvant Vijay Mane Advocate - S T Ingle — 1700030/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 285,34. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAK070000742015
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
1700060/2015
Filing Date
22-01-2015
Registration No
1700030/2015
Registration Date
22-01-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Jayvant Vijay Mane Advocate - S T Ingle
Raj Mohommad Shaikh Ismail
Kailas Natthulal Khatti
Manjunath PattanShetti
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
COURT ORDER SUMMARY This is a witness examination transcript in a criminal case (FIR 3051/2014) related to illegal diesel storage and transportation. The retired Police Inspector Pralhad Kisarv Katkar testified regarding the investigation into diesel smuggling, detailing his procedural steps, evidence collection, and subsequent cross-examination that exposed significant irregularities in his investigation—including lack of proper authorization under the Petroleum Act and failure to verify key details about the accused and seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
COURT ORDER SUMMARY This is a witness examination transcript in a criminal case (FIR 3051/2014) related to illegal diesel storage and transportation. The retired Police Inspector Pralhad Kisarv Katkar testified regarding the investigation into diesel smuggling, detailing his procedural steps, evidence collection, and subsequent cross-examination that exposed significant irregularities in his investigation—including lack of proper authorization under the Petroleum Act and failure to verify key details about the accused and seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts