Usha Ratan Dhanokar vs Nil — 13/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHAK070000702026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
15/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Balapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Usha Ratan Dhanokar
Adv. DHANOKAR RAHUL SANJAY
Vaibhav Ratan Dhanokar
Adv. DHANOKAR RAHUL SANJAY
Gauravkumar Ratan Dhanokar
Adv. DHANOKAR RAHUL SANJAY
Shubhangi Pramod Masane
Adv. DHANOKAR RAHUL SANJAY
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Balapur.
Disposed
Arguments
Public Notice/Proclamation
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 09-01-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Civil Judge at Balapur granted the succession certificate application under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing four petitioners (Usha, Vaibhav, Gaurwakumar, and Shubhangi) as the sole legal heirs of deceased Ratan Vasantrao Dhokar, who died on 02.04.2024. The court found that the petitioners' relationship as spouse and children of the deceased was properly established through death certificates and identity documents, with no objections filed by any other claimants, thereby entitling them to claim succession benefits and inherit the deceased's moveable and immoveable properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Judge at Balapur granted the succession certificate application under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing four petitioners (Usha, Vaibhav, Gaurwakumar, and Shubhangi) as the sole legal heirs of deceased Ratan Vasantrao Dhokar, who died on 02.04.2024. The court found that the petitioners' relationship as spouse and children of the deceased was properly established through death certificates and identity documents, with no objections filed by any other claimants, thereby entitling them to claim succession benefits and inherit the deceased's moveable and immoveable properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts