Sau Janki Milind Asarkar vs Sarpanch Gat Grampanchayat Sawargaon — 191/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R2. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK060036932025
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
1045/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
191/2025
Registration Date
24-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akot
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Akot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau Janki Milind Asarkar
Adv. KUTE DEEPAK MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
Sarpanch Gat Grampanchayat Sawargaon
Sachiv Gat Grampanchayat Sawargaon
Pankaj Rameshwar Kolkhede
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Akot
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Issues |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 17-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The defendants (village panchayat officials) are restrained from disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of her agricultural land (4 hectare 38 are) until final disposal of the suit, despite a revenue order allegedly reserving 5 are for village crematorium. The court found the plaintiff has a prima facie case with balance of convenience in her favor, as the earlier 1982 acquisition order was cancelled and no valid substantive document authorizes the crematorium reservation on her private property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The defendants (village panchayat officials) are restrained from disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of her agricultural land (4 hectare 38 are) until final disposal of the suit, despite a revenue order allegedly reserving 5 are for village crematorium. The court found the plaintiff has a prima facie case with balance of convenience in her favor, as the earlier 1982 acquisition order was cancelled and no valid substantive document authorizes the crematorium reservation on her private property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts