Sau. Archana Pravin Chopade vs Mahemudkha Mansurkha — 26/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4R2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHAK060020142023

Filing Number

538/2023

Filing Date

27-Jul-2023

Registration No

26/2023

Registration Date

05-Aug-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akot

Judge

26-Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O4R2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sau. Archana Pravin Chopade

    Adv. Tikar Gajanan Kashiram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahemudkha Mansurkha

  2. 2.State of Maharashtra Thru. Sub-divisional Officer A(Land Acquisition officer South Central Railway)

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  10. 19-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 26/2023 (Sau. Archana vs. Mahemudkha + 1), the Civil Judge at Akot allowed the plaintiff's application for production of documents. The defendant had opposed the application on grounds of late filing, but the court granted it in the interest of justice to ensure complete and proper adjudication while avoiding multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  12. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  13. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  14. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  15. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  16. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  17. 11-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  19. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  20. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  21. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  22. 30-Apr-2024

    Documents

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  23. 26-Mar-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  24. 26-Mar-2024

    Documents

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  25. 21-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  26. 15-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  27. 13-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  28. 04-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  29. 08-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  30. 01-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  31. 18-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  32. 12-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  33. 02-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  34. 08-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  35. 24-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  36. 27-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  37. 21-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  38. 02-Sep-2023

    Notice Ready

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

  39. 07-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 27-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 26/2023 (Sau. Archana vs. Mahemudkha + 1), the Civil Judge at Akot allowed the plaintiff's application for production of documents. The defendant had opposed the application on grounds of late filing, but the court granted it in the interest of justice to ensure complete and proper adjudication while avoiding multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case