Ku. Divya Rajendra Fuse vs Motiram Mahadeo Fuse Advocate - S.K. Suryawanshi — 28/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4R2. Status: Citation. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHAK060018312022
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
394/2022
Filing Date
29-06-2022
Registration No
28/2022
Registration Date
06-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akot
Judge
27-Jt. Civil Judge Sr.Dn. and A.C.J.M. Akot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ku. Divya Rajendra Fuse
Adv. Kulkarni S. G
Respondent(s)
Motiram Mahadeo Fuse Advocate - S.K. Suryawanshi
Mahendra Motiram Fuse
Pravin Motiram Fuse
Hearing History
Judge: 27-Jt. Civil Judge Sr.Dn. and A.C.J.M. Akot
Citation
Citation
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Citation |
| 06-03-2026 | Citation |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Marathi language court order from a Special Civil Judge dealing with civil disputes related to property/inheritance matters. The document contains multiple petition decisions (Cases 42, 43, and 44). Summary: The court dismissed all petitions filed by the respective parties. In each case, the judge rejected the plaintiffs' claims regarding property disputes and inheritance matters, finding insufficient evidence and documentation to support their contentions. The court upheld the defendants' positions and directed the plaintiffs to proceed with their regular civil suits if they wish to pursue their claims further. No appeals or further relief was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Marathi language court order from a Special Civil Judge dealing with civil disputes related to property/inheritance matters. The document contains multiple petition decisions (Cases 42, 43, and 44). Summary: The court dismissed all petitions filed by the respective parties. In each case, the judge rejected the plaintiffs' claims regarding property disputes and inheritance matters, finding insufficient evidence and documentation to support their contentions. The court upheld the defendants' positions and directed the plaintiffs to proceed with their regular civil suits if they wish to pursue their claims further. No appeals or further relief was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts