Amol Subhash Bahadure vs Mohan Tulshiram Hadole Advocate - A.R.Katta — 59/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4R1. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK060015842022
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
328/2022
Filing Date
09-06-2022
Registration No
59/2022
Registration Date
09-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akot
Judge
26-Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amol Subhash Bahadure
Adv. Tatte Shrirang Shrikant
Respondent(s)
Mohan Tulshiram Hadole Advocate - A.R.Katta
Chief Officer , Nagar Parishad , Akot
Adv. B R Gandhi
Hearing History
Judge: 26-Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 24-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 27-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 18-12-2025 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 18-11-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend his plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The plaintiff sought to add paragraphs regarding the defendant's completed construction of a staircase on public road encroachment (area CDEF), changing the relief sought from temporary to mandatory injunction and declaration of illegality. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication, not prejudicial to the defendant, and permissible since trial had not commenced. The plaintiff is directed to file the amended plaint on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend his plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The plaintiff sought to add paragraphs regarding the defendant's completed construction of a staircase on public road encroachment (area CDEF), changing the relief sought from temporary to mandatory injunction and declaration of illegality. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication, not prejudicial to the defendant, and permissible since trial had not commenced. The plaintiff is directed to file the amended plaint on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts