Rajvir Ashish Ingle Through Minor Natural Guardian Vrushal Ashish Inglei vs Bhujang Jagannath Ingle Advocate - Tikar Gajanan Kashiram — 44/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4R2. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK060011282022
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
248/2022
Filing Date
19-04-2022
Registration No
44/2022
Registration Date
21-04-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akot
Judge
26-Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajvir Ashish Ingle Through Minor Natural Guardian Vrushal Ashish Inglei
Adv. Mangesh S Tale
Hiral Ashish Ingle Through Minor Natural Guardian Vrushali Ashish Ingle
Vrushali Ashish Ingle
Aashadevi Ganeshrao Ingle Through Power Of Attorney Holder Ganeshrao Vishwanath Ingle
Respondent(s)
Bhujang Jagannath Ingle Advocate - Tikar Gajanan Kashiram
Sub Divisional Officer, Akot
Talathi, Girjapur
Hearing History
Judge: 26-Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 24-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 20-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 20-01-2026 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Civil Judge issued show cause notices to the plaintiffs and defendants nos. 2 and 3, requiring them to explain why relief claimed by defendant no.1 should not be granted. The court deferred passing any final order on defendant no.1's relief until the other parties are heard. Additionally, Extra time and Stay of Bail (EP & SB) was allowed upon request by defendant no.1's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Civil Judge issued show cause notices to the plaintiffs and defendants nos. 2 and 3, requiring them to explain why relief claimed by defendant no.1 should not be granted. The court deferred passing any final order on defendant no.1's relief until the other parties are heard. Additionally, Extra time and Stay of Bail (EP & SB) was allowed upon request by defendant no.1's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts