Gulbakshi Subhash Mohokar Through Power Of Attorney Holder Subhash Babarao Mohokar vs Laxman Alias Purushottam Narayan Kakade — 21/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R2. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK060007642025

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2025

Filing Number

177/2025

Filing Date

07-03-2025

Registration No

21/2025

Registration Date

12-03-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akot

Judge

3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Akot

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R2

Petitioner(s)

Gulbakshi Subhash Mohokar Through Power Of Attorney Holder Subhash Babarao Mohokar

Adv. DESHPANDE KISHOR RAMDAS

Respondent(s)

Laxman Alias Purushottam Narayan Kakade

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Akot

20-03-2026

Order on Exh

16-03-2026

Order on Exh

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

05-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

25-06-2025
Order on T.I.

Court Order Summary Case: Civil Petition No. 21/2025 | Court: Joint Civil Judge, Akot, Akola District | Date: 25/06/2025 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership rights or that the respondent committed encroachment on her agricultural land (Plot 248). The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's claims regarding the exact location and extent of alleged encroachment, and determined that the balance of convenience and equity favored the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Civil Petition No. 21/2025 | Court: Joint Civil Judge, Akot, Akola District | Date: 25/06/2025 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership rights or that the respondent committed encroachment on her agricultural land (Plot 248). The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's claims regarding the exact location and extent of alleged encroachment, and determined that the balance of convenience and equity favored the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case