Gulbakshi Subhash Mohokar Through Power Of Attorney Holder Subhash Babarao Mohokar vs Laxman Alias Purushottam Narayan Kakade — 21/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R2. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK060007642025
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2025
Filing Number
177/2025
Filing Date
07-03-2025
Registration No
21/2025
Registration Date
12-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akot
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Akot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gulbakshi Subhash Mohokar Through Power Of Attorney Holder Subhash Babarao Mohokar
Adv. DESHPANDE KISHOR RAMDAS
Respondent(s)
Laxman Alias Purushottam Narayan Kakade
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Akot
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Reply/Say
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Petition No. 21/2025 | Court: Joint Civil Judge, Akot, Akola District | Date: 25/06/2025 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership rights or that the respondent committed encroachment on her agricultural land (Plot 248). The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's claims regarding the exact location and extent of alleged encroachment, and determined that the balance of convenience and equity favored the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Petition No. 21/2025 | Court: Joint Civil Judge, Akot, Akola District | Date: 25/06/2025 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership rights or that the respondent committed encroachment on her agricultural land (Plot 248). The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's claims regarding the exact location and extent of alleged encroachment, and determined that the balance of convenience and equity favored the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts