Ashoksingh Santramsingh Chouhan vs Jakir Shaha Rashid Shah — 11/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 413. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.Appeal

CNR: MHAK050001392026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

80/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akot

Judge

1-District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 413

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashoksingh Santramsingh Chouhan

    Adv. Bodade Mangesh V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jakir Shaha Rashid Shah

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The appeal filed by the victim challenging the inadequate sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has been kept for argument on maintainability. The court held that appeals against inadequate sentences must be filed by the Public Prosecutor under Section 418 BNSS, not by the victim under Section 413 BNSS, and directed the matter to be heard on the question of whether the appeal is maintainable under these statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appeal filed by the victim challenging the inadequate sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has been kept for argument on maintainability. The court held that appeals against inadequate sentences must be filed by the Public Prosecutor under Section 418 BNSS, not by the victim under Section 413 BNSS, and directed the matter to be heard on the question of whether the appeal is maintainable under these statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case