Pawan Dilip Nagle vs State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Akot City Advocate - A.G.P. /A.P.P — 25/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHAK050001312026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akot

Judge

1-District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pawan Dilip Nagle

    Adv. Walsinge Sandip Vitthalrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Akot City Advocate - A.G.P. /A.P.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted bail to Pawan Dilip Nagle in a case involving charges of sexual assault, illegal marriage, and forced abortion. The judge found that the victim lodged no complaint during 18 months of cohabitation, the marriage was primafacie solemnized, the FIR was filed with an 18-month delay, and the investigation was complete, thereby establishing changed circumstances warranting bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Pawan Dilip Nagle in a case involving charges of sexual assault, illegal marriage, and forced abortion. The judge found that the victim lodged no complaint during 18 months of cohabitation, the marriage was primafacie solemnized, the FIR was filed with an 18-month delay, and the investigation was complete, thereby establishing changed circumstances warranting bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case