Abdul Saeed A. Samad vs Abdul Ajim . Samad Ajim Dead Through Lrs. Muntazbi Syed Ahamdali Advocate - Wadalkar Sunil Gandadharrao — 4/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
R.C.A. - Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAK050000382016
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
20/2016
Filing Date
22-01-2016
Registration No
4/2016
Registration Date
22-01-2016
Court
District and Session Court , Akot
Judge
1-District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Saeed A. Samad
Adv. Agrawal R.B
Respondent(s)
Abdul Ajim . Samad Ajim Dead Through Lrs. Muntazbi Syed Ahamdali Advocate - Wadalkar Sunil Gandadharrao
Salma Ab. Ajim Minor G.A.L Mother Bismillabi Abdul Ajim
Bismillabi Abdul Ajim
Mohd. Fayyaj Ab. Ajim
Mohd. Faeem A. Ajim
Ab. Arif A. Sharif
Mohd. Wahid Mohd. Chotu
Ejajoddin Jainul Abedia
Haridas Bhagwan Nare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 A.S.J. Akot
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Civil Appeal No.4/2016 (Abdul Saeed Abdul Samad vs. Abdul Ajim Abdul Samad & Others), the District Judge allowed the application dated 22.12.2023. The court directed that the legal heirs of respondent No.06 be added as necessary parties to the appeal, and an amended copy of the appeal must be filed on record. Most respondents did not file any response despite sufficient opportunities, though respondent No.06 opposed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Civil Appeal No.4/2016 (Abdul Saeed Abdul Samad vs. Abdul Ajim Abdul Samad & Others), the District Judge allowed the application dated 22.12.2023. The court directed that the legal heirs of respondent No.06 be added as necessary parties to the appeal, and an amended copy of the appeal must be filed on record. Most respondents did not file any response despite sufficient opportunities, though respondent No.06 opposed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts