Manav Utthan Seva Samitee through Preist Mahatma Turiyanand vs Smita Suhas Panse and Other — 156/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAK010045512025
e-Filing Number
26-12-2025
Filing Number
2414/2025
Filing Date
26-Dec-2025
Registration No
156/2025
Registration Date
26-Dec-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
3-District Judge II Akola
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manav Utthan Seva Samitee through Preist Mahatma Turiyanand
Adv. Deshpande R. M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smita Suhas Panse and Other
-
2.The Commissioner, Akola Municipal Corporation, Akola
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge II Akola
-
27-Jan-2026
Appearance
District Judge II Akola
-
29-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The District Judge, Akola granted a stay on the execution of the trial court's judgment and decree dated 27.11.2025 in Civil Appeal No. 156/2025. The appellant (original defendant) contended that the trial court improperly granted relief for premises inspection without the plaintiff's request and without adequate opportunity for the parties, arguing that proceeding with the Municipal Corporation's inspection would frustrate the appeal. The court found merit in these arguments and stayed the judgment's execution pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2025
Summary: The District Judge, Akola granted a stay on the execution of the trial court's judgment and decree dated 27.11.2025 in Civil Appeal No. 156/2025. The appellant (original defendant) contended that the trial court improperly granted relief for premises inspection without the plaintiff's request and without adequate opportunity for the parties, arguing that proceeding with the Municipal Corporation's inspection would frustrate the appeal. The court found merit in these arguments and stayed the judgment's execution pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts