Shaikh Maheboob Shaikh Buddu Pappulwale vs Raziya Bi Shaikh Mehboob Pappuwale And Other — 29/2026
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Cri.Appeal
CNR: MHAK010020522025
e-Filing Number
17-06-2025
Filing Number
936/2025
Filing Date
17-Jun-2025
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
4-District Judge III Akola
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shaikh Maheboob Shaikh Buddu Pappulwale
Adv. Adv Ali Raza Khan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raziya Bi Shaikh Mehboob Pappuwale And Other
-
2.Reshma Shaikh Mehboob Pappuwale
-
3.State of Maharashtra Thro. D.G.P., Akola Tq. Dist. Akola
Adv. APP
Case History
-
04-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge III Akola
-
23-Feb-2026
Order on Exhibit
Summary: The District Judge granted a conditional stay of the October 21, 2024 maintenance judgment against appellant Shaikh Maheboob, allowing him to challenge alleged suppression of facts by the respondent. However, the stay is contingent upon the appellant depositing Rs. 1,50,000 (approximately 50% of the Rs. 2,97,000 maintenance arrears) within 15 days to the respondent. The court will decide the merits of whether material facts were suppressed at the final hearing of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Feb-2026
Compliance
District Judge III Akola
-
18-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge III Akola
-
10-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge III Akola
-
06-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge III Akola
-
02-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge III Akola
-
28-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge III Akola
-
21-Jan-2026
Awaiting Notice
District Judge III Akola
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2026
Summary: The District Judge granted a conditional stay of the October 21, 2024 maintenance judgment against appellant Shaikh Maheboob, allowing him to challenge alleged suppression of facts by the respondent. However, the stay is contingent upon the appellant depositing Rs. 1,50,000 (approximately 50% of the Rs. 2,97,000 maintenance arrears) within 15 days to the respondent. The court will decide the merits of whether material facts were suppressed at the final hearing of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts