Shama Kausar Majid Kha vs NIL — 313/2025
Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section Section-29. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHAK010018652025
e-Filing Number
19-04-2025
Filing Number
1052/2025
Filing Date
09-Jun-2025
Registration No
313/2025
Registration Date
10-Jun-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
3-District Judge II Akola
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shama Kausar Majid Kha
Adv. ROKADE PRADIP SURESH
-
2.Alina Tehrim Majid Kha minor thorugh Shama Majid Kha
Adv. ROKADE PRADIP SURESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District Court at Akola rejected an application by a mother seeking permission to sell ancestral agricultural property on behalf of her 15-year-old minor daughter. The court held that under Mohammedan Law, the mother is not a de jure guardian and lacks legal authority to sell a minor's immovable property unless formally appointed as executrix, making any such transaction void rather than merely voidable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge II Akola
-
06-Mar-2026
Citation
District Judge II Akola
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge II Akola
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge II Akola
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge II Akola
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge II Akola
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge II Akola
-
03-Nov-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge II Akola
-
30-Sep-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge II Akola
-
25-Aug-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge II Akola
-
11-Aug-2025
Compliance
District Judge II Akola
-
12-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 313/2025
Summary The District Court at Akola rejected an application by a mother seeking permission to sell ancestral agricultural property on behalf of her 15-year-old minor daughter. The court held that under Mohammedan Law, the mother is not a de jure guardian and lacks legal authority to sell a minor's immovable property unless formally appointed as executrix, making any such transaction void rather than merely voidable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts