State of Maharashtra thro. P.S.O.P.S. Mana, tq.Murtizapur, dist.Akola vs Anil Shrikrushna Tayade — 109/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,309. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAK010015312024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
769/2024
Filing Date
17-05-2024
Registration No
109/2024
Registration Date
17-05-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge II Akola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thro. P.S.O.P.S. Mana, tq.Murtizapur, dist.Akola
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Anil Shrikrushna Tayade
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge II Akola
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 17-02-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 10-02-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 28-01-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 14-01-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
Interim Orders
Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, rejected the bail application of Anil Tayade (S.T. No. 109/2024) filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The accused was charged with the murder of Shobha Gajanan Lande on 23.01.2024. The court found the offense serious and grave, considering the High Court's earlier rejection of bail, apprehensions of absconding, and risk of tampering with evidence. The court directed the prosecution to expedite production of forensic reports and physical evidence (muddemal) to commence the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Bail Application Rejected The Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, rejected the bail application of Anil Tayade (S.T. No. 109/2024) filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The accused was charged with the murder of Shobha Gajanan Lande on 23.01.2024. The court found the offense serious and grave, considering the High Court's earlier rejection of bail, apprehensions of absconding, and risk of tampering with evidence. The court directed the prosecution to expedite production of forensic reports and physical evidence (muddemal) to commence the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts