State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. P.S. GRP Akola. vs Biku Abraham Mandal — 78/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20(b),ii(c),29. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

NDPS. S. Case

CNR: MHAK010014492025

Filing Number

632/2025

Filing Date

23-Apr-2025

Registration No

78/2025

Registration Date

24-Apr-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

5-Adhoc District Judge I Akola

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20(b),ii(c),29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. P.S. GRP Akola.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Biku Abraham Mandal

  2. 2.Sushant alias Shrikant Parshuram Nayak

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  7. 26-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  11. 30-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  12. 15-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  14. 22-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  16. 09-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  19. 29-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  20. 04-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge II Akola

  21. 20-Jun-2025

    Order on Exhibit

    SUMMARY Biku Abraham Mandal's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence that the applicant was involved in possessing commercial quantity ganja (24.700 gm, worth Rs. 3,70,000), charged under NDPS Act Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29, and rejected the parity argument with a co-accused who had been granted bail by the High Court, distinguishing the present applicant's direct possession of the contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 20-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge II Akola

  23. 19-Jun-2025

    Order on Exh

    District Judge II Akola

  24. 13-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge II Akola

  25. 10-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge II Akola

  26. 03-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge II Akola

  27. 26-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge II Akola

  28. 21-May-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge II Akola

  29. 05-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 23-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 78/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY Biku Abraham Mandal's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence that the applicant was involved in possessing commercial quantity ganja (24.700 gm, worth Rs. 3,70,000), charged under NDPS Act Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29, and rejected the parity argument with a co-accused who had been granted bail by the High Court, distinguishing the present applicant's direct possession of the contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case