State of Maharashtra thro.P.S.O.P.S.City Kotwali,Akola vs Prakash Pralhad Wankhade Advocate - Honale P. B. — 54/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,377,170,506. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Spl.Case Child Prot. - Spl.Case Child Prot. Act
CNR: MHAK010013232023
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
21-04-2023
Filing Number
603/2023
Filing Date
21-04-2023
Registration No
54/2023
Registration Date
21-04-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
4-District Judge III Akola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thro.P.S.O.P.S.City Kotwali,Akola
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Prakash Pralhad Wankhade Advocate - Honale P. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge III Akola
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 13-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Bail Granted The court allowed the bail application of accused Prakash Wankhade in POCSO case, citing his serious urinary tract infection requiring catheterization and the medical evidence contradicting the prosecution's allegations of forceful sexual assault (no physical injuries, no semen traces detected). He was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with the condition that he cannot enter the victim's village Ridhora until trial conclusion and must not intimidate prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Bail Granted The court allowed the bail application of accused Prakash Wankhade in POCSO case, citing his serious urinary tract infection requiring catheterization and the medical evidence contradicting the prosecution's allegations of forceful sexual assault (no physical injuries, no semen traces detected). He was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with the condition that he cannot enter the victim's village Ridhora until trial conclusion and must not intimidate prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts