Janardhan Govinda Dhanokar vs Smt. Dropadabai Wd/o Waman Dhanokar ( Name deleted since died ) Ku. Suman D/o Waman Dhanokar — 79/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
R.C.A. - Civil Appeal
CNR: MHAK010011442023
Filing Number
634/2023
Filing Date
03-04-2023
Registration No
79/2023
Registration Date
23-06-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
4-District Judge III Akola
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Janardhan Govinda Dhanokar
Adv. Ingle S.S.
Janardhan Govinda Dhanokar
Vishwanath Sukhdeo Dhanokar
Raghunath Sukhdeo Dhanokar
Suhila Shrirma Pachpor
Dropadi Devidas Belsare
Respondent(s)
Smt. Dropadabai Wd/o Waman Dhanokar ( Name deleted since died ) Ku. Suman D/o Waman Dhanokar
Prakash Waman Dhanokar
Santosh Waman Dhanokar
Sunanda Kamlakar Hadole
Ku. Suman Waman Dhanorkar
Sau Kusum Ramdas Palhade
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge III Akola
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 11-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Judge-3, Akola dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment awarding plaintiffs a 1/4th collective share in ancestral joint family property with partition rights. The court found that the suit land (Gat No. 110) was ancestral joint family property inherited from common ancestor Govinda Dhanokar, remained unpartitioned, and defendants were given ample opportunity to present their defense despite their dilatory tactics. The court rejected defendants' claims that the property was disposed of during Govinda's lifetime, finding no credible evidence to support such disposals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Judge-3, Akola dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment awarding plaintiffs a 1/4th collective share in ancestral joint family property with partition rights. The court found that the suit land (Gat No. 110) was ancestral joint family property inherited from common ancestor Govinda Dhanokar, remained unpartitioned, and defendants were given ample opportunity to present their defense despite their dilatory tactics. The court rejected defendants' claims that the property was disposed of during Govinda's lifetime, finding no credible evidence to support such disposals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts