Janardhan Govinda Dhanokar vs Smt. Dropadabai Wd/o Waman Dhanokar ( Name deleted since died ) Ku. Suman D/o Waman Dhanokar — 79/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.A. - Civil Appeal

CNR: MHAK010011442023

Filing Number

634/2023

Filing Date

03-Apr-2023

Registration No

79/2023

Registration Date

23-Jun-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

4-District Judge III Akola

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Janardhan Govinda Dhanokar

    Adv. Ingle S.S.

  2. 2.Janardhan Govinda Dhanokar

  3. 3.Vishwanath Sukhdeo Dhanokar

  4. 4.Raghunath Sukhdeo Dhanokar

  5. 5.Suhila Shrirma Pachpor

  6. 6.Dropadi Devidas Belsare

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Dropadabai Wd/o Waman Dhanokar ( Name deleted since died ) Ku. Suman D/o Waman Dhanokar

  2. 2.Prakash Waman Dhanokar

  3. 3.Santosh Waman Dhanokar

  4. 4.Sunanda Kamlakar Hadole

  5. 5.Ku. Suman Waman Dhanorkar

  6. 6.Sau Kusum Ramdas Palhade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Summary The District Judge-3, Akola dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment awarding plaintiffs a 1/4th collective share in ancestral joint family property with partition rights. The court found that the suit land (Gat No. 110) was ancestral joint family property inherited from common ancestor Govinda Dhanokar, remained unpartitioned, and defendants were given ample opportunity to present their defense despite their dilatory tactics. The court rejected defendants' claims that the property was disposed of during Govinda's lifetime, finding no credible evidence to support such disposals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge III Akola

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge III Akola

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge III Akola

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge III Akola

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  13. 29-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  14. 30-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  15. 29-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  16. 27-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  17. 14-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  18. 17-Jan-2025

    Paper Book

    District Judge III Akola

  19. 03-Dec-2024

    Paper Book

    District Judge III Akola

  20. 04-Nov-2024

    Paper Book

    District Judge III Akola

  21. 13-Sep-2024

    Paper Book

    District Judge -I Akola

  22. 24-Jun-2024

    Paper Book

    District Judge -I Akola

  23. 03-Apr-2024

    Awaiting R and P

    District Judge III Akola

  24. 21-Feb-2024

    Awaiting R and P

    District Judge III Akola

  25. 18-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge III Akola

  26. 23-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge IV Akola

  27. 29-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge IV Akola

  28. 21-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge IV Akola

  29. 26-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge IV Akola

  30. 27-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 03-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge-3, Akola dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment awarding plaintiffs a 1/4th collective share in ancestral joint family property with partition rights. The court found that the suit land (Gat No. 110) was ancestral joint family property inherited from common ancestor Govinda Dhanokar, remained unpartitioned, and defendants were given ample opportunity to present their defense despite their dilatory tactics. The court rejected defendants' claims that the property was disposed of during Govinda's lifetime, finding no credible evidence to support such disposals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case