Bhagvat Pandurang Shinagare vs State of Maharashtra Thro. PSO PS Khadan, Akola Tq. Dist. Akola Advocate - APP — 172/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHAK010009892026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
467/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
4-District Judge III Akola
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagvat Pandurang Shinagare
Adv. A. F. S. QUAZI
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thro. PSO PS (Police Station) Khadan, Akola Tq. Dist. Akola Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge III Akola
Disposed
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The District Court of Akola granted pre-arrest bail to Bhagvat Pandurang Shinagare under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, who was accused of abetting the suicide of Vaibhao Ghuge through harassment over loan repayment. The court found the FIR allegations insufficient to establish prima facie guilt, noting the three-month delay in lodging the report and lack of prior complaints despite alleged harassment since 2020-21, concluding that arrest was unnecessary. Bail was granted with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000, requirement not to threaten witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The District Court of Akola granted pre-arrest bail to Bhagvat Pandurang Shinagare under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, who was accused of abetting the suicide of Vaibhao Ghuge through harassment over loan repayment. The court found the FIR allegations insufficient to establish prima facie guilt, noting the three-month delay in lodging the report and lack of prior complaints despite alleged harassment since 2020-21, concluding that arrest was unnecessary. Bail was granted with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000, requirement not to threaten witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts