Suraj Arun Pande vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO PS Civil Akola. Tq. Dist. Akola. Advocate - APP — 153/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHAK010009452026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

434/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

153/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

2-District Judge -I Akola

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75(1),75(2),78(2),126(2),351(2),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suraj Arun Pande

    Adv. Aayush Milind Niwane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO PS (Police Station) Civil Akola. Tq. Dist. Akola. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court granted bail to Suraj Arun Pande, accused of sexually harassing an 18-year-old girl, finding that investigation was complete and no purpose would be served by continued custody. The court imposed stringent conditions including a ₹25,000 bond, relocation outside Akola taluka for six months, weekly police station attendance, and a prohibition on contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge -I Akola

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge -I Akola

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge -I Akola

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 153/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to Suraj Arun Pande, accused of sexually harassing an 18-year-old girl, finding that investigation was complete and no purpose would be served by continued custody. The court imposed stringent conditions including a ₹25,000 bond, relocation outside Akola taluka for six months, weekly police station attendance, and a prohibition on contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case