Nivrutti Vijay Natkar vs State of Maharashtra Thro. PSO PS Akot File, Akola Tq. Dist. Akola Advocate - APP — 147/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHAK010009072026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

409/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

4-District Judge III Akola

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64,64(2)(M)
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Rules Section 4,5(L),8,9(L),10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nivrutti Vijay Natkar

    Adv. PAKHALE SAMADHAN NARAYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Thro. PSO PS (Police Station) Akot File, Akola Tq. Dist. Akola Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Maharashtra High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Nivrutti Vijay Natkar, accused of sexually abusing a 15-year-old minor and violating child labor laws. The court found that investigation was complete, the victim showed no objection to bail, and evidence suggested a consensual relationship rather than rape, determining arrest unnecessary and releasing him on Rs. 25,000 bail with conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge III Akola

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge III Akola

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Maharashtra High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Nivrutti Vijay Natkar, accused of sexually abusing a 15-year-old minor and violating child labor laws. The court found that investigation was complete, the victim showed no objection to bail, and evidence suggested a consensual relationship rather than rape, determining arrest unnecessary and releasing him on Rs. 25,000 bail with conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case