Zahid Gani Mircha Abdul Gani Mircha vs State of Maharashtra Thro. PSO PS Cyber Cell, Akola Tq. Dist. Akola Advocate - APP — 23/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Rev.App.

CNR: MHAK010008952026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

400/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

23/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

4-District Judge III Akola

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Zahid Gani Mircha Abdul Gani Mircha

    Adv. Gawai S.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Thro. PSO PS (Police Station) Cyber Cell, Akola Tq. Dist. Akola Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The District Judge of Akola disposed of the Criminal Revision Petition No. 23/2026 filed by Zahid Gani Mircha without examining the merits, as the petitioner's counsel stated that circumstances had changed significantly since the original order and the grounds became infructuous. The accused withdrew the petition to pursue a separate regular bail application instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge III Akola

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge III Akola

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge III Akola

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge of Akola disposed of the Criminal Revision Petition No. 23/2026 filed by Zahid Gani Mircha without examining the merits, as the petitioner's counsel stated that circumstances had changed significantly since the original order and the grounds became infructuous. The accused withdrew the petition to pursue a separate regular bail application instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case