Shaikh Salim Shaikh Raullah vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. P.S. Balapur Tq. Balapur Dist. Akola. Advocate - APP — 141/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 07th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHAK010008792026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
390/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
141/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
3-District Judge II Akola
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Salim Shaikh Raullah
Adv. NAVRANGBADE MOHD YUSUF
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. P.S. Balapur Tq. Balapur Dist. Akola. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge II Akola
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Order |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court at Akola granted pre-arrest bail to Shaikh Salim Shaikh Raullah in a case involving charges under Sections 109, 118(2), 352, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a quarrel over an amount where he allegedly held the injured person while another accused inflicted knife wounds. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, nothing required recovery, and the offense did not warrant death sentence, thus releasing him on Rs. 20,000 bail with conditions including weekly police station attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court at Akola granted pre-arrest bail to Shaikh Salim Shaikh Raullah in a case involving charges under Sections 109, 118(2), 352, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a quarrel over an amount where he allegedly held the injured person while another accused inflicted knife wounds. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, nothing required recovery, and the offense did not warrant death sentence, thus releasing him on Rs. 20,000 bail with conditions including weekly police station attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts