Sunil Dharma Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra Through PSOPS Khadan, Akola. Tq. Dist. Akola. Advocate - APP — 138/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 07th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHAK010008742026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-02-2026

Filing Number

387/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

4-District Judge III Akola

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 342(1),341(1),340(2),337,336(2),336(3),319(2),318(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Dharma Jadhav

Adv. Aayush Milind Niwane

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSOPS Khadan, Akola. Tq. Dist. Akola. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge III Akola

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Order

04-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The District Judge rejected Sunil Dharma Jadhav's pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that Jadhav was the mastermind of a job-fraud scheme where he and co-accused induced a retired teacher to pay ₹33 lakh by falsely promising government employment through MPSC, ultimately providing forged appointment documents. The court noted that Jadhav's defense that he was merely an intermediary was contradicted by evidence including photographs of him meeting the complainant's son at an ITC hotel and a co-accused's notarized statement acknowledging his role, warranting custodial interrogation for investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge rejected Sunil Dharma Jadhav's pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that Jadhav was the mastermind of a job-fraud scheme where he and co-accused induced a retired teacher to pay ₹33 lakh by falsely promising government employment through MPSC, ultimately providing forged appointment documents. The court noted that Jadhav's defense that he was merely an intermediary was contradicted by evidence including photographs of him meeting the complainant's son at an ITC hotel and a co-accused's notarized statement acknowledging his role, warranting custodial interrogation for investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Akola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case