State of Maharashtra through P.S.O.P.S.Patur Dist Akola vs Gopichand Rajaram Chavhan Advocate - Umbarkar N.N., Chief LADC — 56/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,506,498A. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAK010008082023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
310/2023
Filing Date
28-02-2023
Registration No
56/2023
Registration Date
28-02-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Akola
Judge
5-Adhoc District Judge I Akola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through P.S.O.P.S.Patur Dist Akola
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gopichand Rajaram Chavhan Advocate - Umbarkar N.N., Chief LADC
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Adhoc District Judge I Akola
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This document is the deposition of Prosecution Witness No. 2 (Shyam Kamaldas Pawar) in case S.T. No. 56/2023 (State v. Gopichand), dated 06.03.2026. The witness testified that on 13.10.2022, he found the accused holding a blood-stained axe outside his house after hearing disturbances; the accused's wife Sangita was found severely injured and later died in hospital. The witness underwent examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with the court recording his testimony and exhibit identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document is the deposition of Prosecution Witness No. 2 (Shyam Kamaldas Pawar) in case S.T. No. 56/2023 (State v. Gopichand), dated 06.03.2026. The witness testified that on 13.10.2022, he found the accused holding a blood-stained axe outside his house after hearing disturbances; the accused's wife Sangita was found severely injured and later died in hospital. The witness underwent examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with the court recording his testimony and exhibit identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts