Abdul Shakil Shaikh Jalil vs Farhana Parveen Abdul Shakil And Other — 64/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Compliance Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.Appeal

CNR: MHAK010005472026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

234/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

3-District Judge II Akola

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29

Petitioner(s)

1.Abdul Shakil Shaikh Jalil

Adv. Zafar Khan Ismail Khan

Respondent(s)

1.Farhana Parveen Abdul Shakil And Other
2.Amayara Fatema Abdul Shakil Minor Thro. N G Mother Farhana Parveen
3.State of Maharashtra Thro. D.G.P., Akola Tq. Dist. Akola

Adv. APP

Case History

10-Apr-2026

Next hearingPending
06-Mar-2026

Compliance

District Judge II Akola
12-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary: The Court of Sessions at Akola granted a partial stay of the trial court's order rejecting the appellant's bail application in a maintenance case. The appellant was ordered to deposit Rs. 35,000 as maintenance amount in court, after which the enforcement of the impugned order would be stayed pending further proceedings. The court found that without the stay, the appellant would suffer irreparable loss and the appeal would be frustrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Feb-2026

Compliance

District Judge II Akola
11-Feb-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

District Judge II Akola
10-Feb-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

District Judge II Akola
09-Feb-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

District Judge II Akola
07-Feb-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

District Judge II Akola
04-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
03-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Sessions at Akola granted a partial stay of the trial court's order rejecting the appellant's bail application in a maintenance case. The appellant was ordered to deposit Rs. 35,000 as maintenance amount in court, after which the enforcement of the impugned order would be stayed pending further proceedings. The court found that without the stay, the appellant would suffer irreparable loss and the appeal would be frustrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.