The State of Mahrashtra vs Sahebrao Tukaram Choudhari — 738/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506,34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH250031772021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2380/2021
Filing Date
14-12-2021
Registration No
738/2021
Registration Date
14-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD And JMFC
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1098
Police Station
PARNER POLICE STATION
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Mahrashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sahebrao Tukaram Choudhari
Aashru Tukaram Choudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD And JMFC
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Case No. 738/2021 at Parner Court, Maharashtra, the court acquitted both accused Sahebrao Tukaram Chaudhary and Ashru Tukaram Chaudhary of all charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, 506 with Section 34. The court found that although the complainant alleged the accused assaulted him, abused him verbally, and threatened him on 18 November 2020, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony between examination-in-chief and cross-examination, coupled with absence of corroborating medical evidence in the case record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Case No. 738/2021 at Parner Court, Maharashtra, the court acquitted both accused Sahebrao Tukaram Chaudhary and Ashru Tukaram Chaudhary of all charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, 506 with Section 34. The court found that although the complainant alleged the accused assaulted him, abused him verbally, and threatened him on 18 November 2020, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony between examination-in-chief and cross-examination, coupled with absence of corroborating medical evidence in the case record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts