Sushila Popat Paradhi vs Kalabai Chima Kale — 989/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH250027282025

e-Filing Number

25-11-2025

Filing Number

1105/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

989/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sushila Popat Paradhi

    Adv. Ajit Pratap Rokade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalabai Chima Kale

  2. 2.Pandurang Chima Kale

  3. 3.Bhau Chima Kale

  4. 4.Sakhubai Baban Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court decreed the partition suit in favor of an amicable settlement reached through mediation between the plaintiff and defendant, as documented in the compromise agreement (Exh. 17). The judgment directs that a formal decree be prepared incorporating the compromise terms and any accompanying map, with court fees to be refunded as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  9. 13-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 989/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed the partition suit in favor of an amicable settlement reached through mediation between the plaintiff and defendant, as documented in the compromise agreement (Exh. 17). The judgment directs that a formal decree be prepared incorporating the compromise terms and any accompanying map, with court fees to be refunded as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case