Suman Kashinath Date Through Mangesh Kashinath Date vs Vaibhav Khandu Dhokale Advocate - Kaware G. P. — 411/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH250014572023

Issues

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

04-06-2023

Filing Number

462/2023

Filing Date

06-06-2023

Registration No

411/2023

Registration Date

08-06-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 36,37

Petitioner(s)

Suman Kashinath Date Through Mangesh Kashinath Date

Adv. Patil Y. B.

Respondent(s)

Vaibhav Khandu Dhokale Advocate - Kaware G. P.

Ajinkya Khandu Dhokale

Khandu Maruti Dhokale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

13-04-2026

Issues

09-03-2026

Issues

02-02-2026

Issues

22-12-2025

Issues

03-11-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

16-01-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary of Court Order Case: Reg. Mut. Case No. 452/2022 and 411/2023 (Parnera Civil Court, Maharashtra) Outcome: The court granted the interim injunction (interim stay order) in Case No. 452/2022 filed by Vaibhav and Ajinkya against defendants Suman and others, restraining them from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession and cultivation rights over the northern half of Plot No. 356 in village Khadkwadi. Simultaneously, the court dismissed the interim injunction application in Case No. 411/2023 filed by Suman against the same defendants, holding that Suman's purchased land (from Lakshman Dhokle's heirs) lies in the middle portion of Plot 356 and does not overlap with the plaintiffs' ancestral property rights established through prior court decrees and land partition records dating back to 2001 and 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Order Case: Reg. Mut. Case No. 452/2022 and 411/2023 (Parnera Civil Court, Maharashtra) Outcome: The court granted the interim injunction (interim stay order) in Case No. 452/2022 filed by Vaibhav and Ajinkya against defendants Suman and others, restraining them from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession and cultivation rights over the northern half of Plot No. 356 in village Khadkwadi. Simultaneously, the court dismissed the interim injunction application in Case No. 411/2023 filed by Suman against the same defendants, holding that Suman's purchased land (from Lakshman Dhokle's heirs) lies in the middle portion of Plot 356 and does not overlap with the plaintiffs' ancestral property rights established through prior court decrees and land partition records dating back to 2001 and 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case