Suman Kashinath Date Through Mangesh Kashinath Date vs Vaibhav Khandu Dhokale Advocate - Kaware G. P. — 411/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH250014572023
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
04-06-2023
Filing Number
462/2023
Filing Date
06-06-2023
Registration No
411/2023
Registration Date
08-06-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suman Kashinath Date Through Mangesh Kashinath Date
Adv. Patil Y. B.
Respondent(s)
Vaibhav Khandu Dhokale Advocate - Kaware G. P.
Ajinkya Khandu Dhokale
Khandu Maruti Dhokale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 02-02-2026 | Issues | |
| 22-12-2025 | Issues | |
| 03-11-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Order Case: Reg. Mut. Case No. 452/2022 and 411/2023 (Parnera Civil Court, Maharashtra) Outcome: The court granted the interim injunction (interim stay order) in Case No. 452/2022 filed by Vaibhav and Ajinkya against defendants Suman and others, restraining them from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession and cultivation rights over the northern half of Plot No. 356 in village Khadkwadi. Simultaneously, the court dismissed the interim injunction application in Case No. 411/2023 filed by Suman against the same defendants, holding that Suman's purchased land (from Lakshman Dhokle's heirs) lies in the middle portion of Plot 356 and does not overlap with the plaintiffs' ancestral property rights established through prior court decrees and land partition records dating back to 2001 and 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Order Case: Reg. Mut. Case No. 452/2022 and 411/2023 (Parnera Civil Court, Maharashtra) Outcome: The court granted the interim injunction (interim stay order) in Case No. 452/2022 filed by Vaibhav and Ajinkya against defendants Suman and others, restraining them from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession and cultivation rights over the northern half of Plot No. 356 in village Khadkwadi. Simultaneously, the court dismissed the interim injunction application in Case No. 411/2023 filed by Suman against the same defendants, holding that Suman's purchased land (from Lakshman Dhokle's heirs) lies in the middle portion of Plot 356 and does not overlap with the plaintiffs' ancestral property rights established through prior court decrees and land partition records dating back to 2001 and 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts