Eknath Bapu Pathare vs Pralhad Bapu Pathare Advocate - sanklecha A.M. — 472/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34&38. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH250012982024

Depositing Amount

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

24-06-2024

Filing Number

544/2024

Filing Date

01-07-2024

Registration No

472/2024

Registration Date

05-07-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34&38
HINDU SUCCESSION ACT Section 6

Petitioner(s)

Eknath Bapu Pathare

Adv. Gaikwad R. S.

Respondent(s)

Pralhad Bapu Pathare Advocate - sanklecha A.M.

Rahibai Nivrutti Pathare

Adv. NIL

Dattatray Nivrutti Pathare

Adv. NIL

Kesharbai Dattatray Thokal

Adv. NIL

Bhagubai Gangadhr Narode

Adv. NIL

Tukaram Bhanudas Jagatap

Adv. NIL

Tukaram Patilba Pathare

Adv. NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

06-04-2026

Depositing Amount

09-03-2026

Depositing Amount

09-03-2026

Depositing Amount

16-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

14-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

01-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by the plaintiff (Eknath) in this partition suit is allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to implead Surekha Dattatraya Pathare and Nikhil Dattatraya Pathare (property purchasers) as parties to the suit and to carry out consequential amendments to the plaint, as third-party interests were created in the suit properties through sale-deeds executed by defendants during the pendency of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by the plaintiff (Eknath) in this partition suit is allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to implead Surekha Dattatraya Pathare and Nikhil Dattatraya Pathare (property purchasers) as parties to the suit and to carry out consequential amendments to the plaint, as third-party interests were created in the suit properties through sale-deeds executed by defendants during the pendency of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case