Laxman Bhau Wabale vs Suhas Balu Wabale — 5/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5-21-11(2),54,. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition

CNR: MHAH250006462025

Steps_Unready

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2025

Filing Number

306/2025

Filing Date

19-03-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

19-03-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner

Judge

5-Jt. CJJD And JMFC

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 5-21-11(2),54,

Petitioner(s)

Laxman Bhau Wabale

Adv. PANDULE NILESH DIGAMBAR

Reshma Laxman Wabale

Adv. PANDULE NILESH DIGAMBAR

Viraj Laxman Wabale M.G. Laxman Bhau Wabale

Adv. PANDULE NILESH DIGAMBAR

Respondent(s)

Suhas Balu Wabale

Balu Ganpat Wabale

Ashabai Balu Wabale

Ujwala Sandip Chahal

Anita Sandip Pathare

Bhau Ganpat Wabale

Hirabai Bhau Wabale

Sulbha Kakasaheb Badhe

Sindhu Ravsaheb Rawade

Latabai Dattu Wabale

Nita Dattu Wabale

Nitin Dattu Wabale

Sandip Dattu Wabale

Zumbrabai Baban Badhe

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD And JMFC

30-03-2026

Steps_Unready

23-03-2026

Order on Exh

09-03-2026

Order on Exh

23-02-2026

Order on Exh

10-02-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

30-03-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary Temporary Injunction Granted The court allowed the application filed by decree holders (Laxman Wabale and others) and granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants (JD No.1 and JD Nos. 10-13) from carrying out any temporary or permanent construction on the suit properties until the Lok Adalat award in the partition case (RCS No.6/2024) is executed. The court found that the decree holders have a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and preventing construction is necessary to preserve the subject matter and ensure proper execution of the partition decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Temporary Injunction Granted The court allowed the application filed by decree holders (Laxman Wabale and others) and granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants (JD No.1 and JD Nos. 10-13) from carrying out any temporary or permanent construction on the suit properties until the Lok Adalat award in the partition case (RCS No.6/2024) is executed. The court found that the decree holders have a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and preventing construction is necessary to preserve the subject matter and ensure proper execution of the partition decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case