Laxman Bhau Wabale vs Suhas Balu Wabale — 5/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5-21-11(2),54. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Steps_Unready Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition

CNR: MHAH250006462025

e-Filing Number

17-03-2025

Filing Number

306/2025

Filing Date

19-Mar-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 5-21-11(2),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Bhau Wabale

    Adv. PANDULE NILESH DIGAMBAR

  2. 2.Reshma Laxman Wabale

    Adv. PANDULE NILESH DIGAMBAR

  3. 3.Viraj Laxman Wabale M.G. Laxman Bhau Wabale

    Adv. PANDULE NILESH DIGAMBAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suhas Balu Wabale

  2. 2.Balu Ganpat Wabale

  3. 3.Ashabai Balu Wabale

  4. 4.Ujwala Sandip Chahal

  5. 5.Anita Sandip Pathare

  6. 6.Bhau Ganpat Wabale

  7. 7.Hirabai Bhau Wabale

  8. 8.Sulbha Kakasaheb Badhe

  9. 9.Sindhu Ravsaheb Rawade

  10. 10.Latabai Dattu Wabale

  11. 11.Nita Dattu Wabale

  12. 12.Nitin Dattu Wabale

  13. 13.Sandip Dattu Wabale

  14. 14.Zumbrabai Baban Badhe

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary Temporary Injunction Granted The court allowed the application filed by decree holders (Laxman Wabale and others) and granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants (JD No.1 and JD Nos. 10-13) from carrying out any temporary or permanent construction on the suit properties until the Lok Adalat award in the partition case (RCS No.6/2024) is executed. The court found that the decree holders have a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and preventing construction is necessary to preserve the subject matter and ensure proper execution of the partition decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  14. 14-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  16. 11-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  17. 09-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 09-May-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

  19. 08-May-2025

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

  20. 05-May-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

  21. 28-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

  24. 25-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 19-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Temporary Injunction Granted The court allowed the application filed by decree holders (Laxman Wabale and others) and granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants (JD No.1 and JD Nos. 10-13) from carrying out any temporary or permanent construction on the suit properties until the Lok Adalat award in the partition case (RCS No.6/2024) is executed. The court found that the decree holders have a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and preventing construction is necessary to preserve the subject matter and ensure proper execution of the partition decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case