Linata Sushil Chikane vs Sushil Sudarshan Chikane Advocate - NIL — 52/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH250005912024
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2024
Filing Number
356/2024
Filing Date
11-03-2024
Registration No
52/2024
Registration Date
12-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Linata Sushil Chikane
Adv. DESHMANE AKSHAY SURESH
Krushn Sushil Chikane
Adv. NIL
Respondent(s)
Sushil Sudarshan Chikane Advocate - NIL
Sudarshan Kondiba Chikane
Shobha Sudarshan Chikane
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Evidence
Order
Order
Reply Unready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-03-2026 | Order | |
| 23-02-2026 | Order | |
| 09-01-2026 | Reply Unready | |
| 29-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month to petitioner 1 and Rs. 3,000 per month to petitioner 2 (child), effective from the date of filing the petition until final disposal of the main case. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and the husband's financial capacity to provide maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month to petitioner 1 and Rs. 3,000 per month to petitioner 2 (child), effective from the date of filing the petition until final disposal of the main case. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and the husband's financial capacity to provide maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts