Mansur Hasan Shaikh vs Majanu Rajjak Shaikh — 120/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH250003892026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
133/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mansur Hasan Shaikh
Adv. SHAIKH JAMIR AYUB
-
2.Salim Hasan Shaikh
Adv. SHAIKH JAMIR AYUB
Respondent(s)
-
1.Majanu Rajjak Shaikh
Case History
-
22-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
04-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
01-Apr-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
25-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Court Order Summary Petition ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the Tahsildar's order dated 18/12/2025 (Road Case No. 181/2022) and directed the defendant to cease obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 254). The petitioner's argument regarding the unlawful exercise of authority under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 was upheld, with costs awarded in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
23-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
13-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
09-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 120/2026
Court Order Summary Petition ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the Tahsildar's order dated 18/12/2025 (Road Case No. 181/2022) and directed the defendant to cease obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 254). The petitioner's argument regarding the unlawful exercise of authority under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 was upheld, with costs awarded in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts