The State of Mahrashtra vs Santosh Shankar More — 129/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH250003802023
Filing Number
204/2023
Filing Date
09-Feb-2023
Registration No
129/2023
Registration Date
10-Feb-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
354
Police Station
PARNER POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Mahrashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Shankar More
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court discharged accused Santosh Shankar More of charges under Section 65-E of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to file the essential chemical analysis report despite multiple opportunities, making it impossible to prove the accused's possession of prohibited articles and thus rendering trial purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
29-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
29-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
29-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd And JMFC
-
29-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd And JMFC
-
26-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd And JMFC
-
29-Nov-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd And JMFC
-
14-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
26-Apr-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Cjjd And JMFC
-
14-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 129/2023
Summary: The court discharged accused Santosh Shankar More of charges under Section 65-E of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to file the essential chemical analysis report despite multiple opportunities, making it impossible to prove the accused's possession of prohibited articles and thus rendering trial purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts