Ramdas Dnyandev Ghavate vs Ramdas Maruti Salke — 87/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH250002982026

W.S. and Say

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner

Judge

2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,

Petitioner(s)

Ramdas Dnyandev Ghavate

Adv. Unmesh bhausaheb Chaudhari

Respondent(s)

Ramdas Maruti Salke

Nanda Ramdas Salke

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner

20-03-2026

W.S. and Say

17-03-2026

Order on Exh

16-03-2026

Order on Exh

11-03-2026

Order on Exh

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

20-03-2026
Order on T.I.

Court Order Summary Case: Civil Application No. 87/2026 (Ramdas Ghavate v. Ramdas Salke & Others) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction is ALLOWED. The court granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction, restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the rented property, preventing sale/transfer of the property, and restraining harassment. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting the relief. Costs of the application absorbed in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Civil Application No. 87/2026 (Ramdas Ghavate v. Ramdas Salke & Others) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction is ALLOWED. The court granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction, restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the rented property, preventing sale/transfer of the property, and restraining harassment. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting the relief. Costs of the application absorbed in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case