Ramdas Dnyandev Ghavate vs Ramdas Maruti Salke — 87/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH250002982026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
87/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramdas Dnyandev Ghavate
Adv. Unmesh bhausaheb Chaudhari
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramdas Maruti Salke
-
2.Nanda Ramdas Salke
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
08-May-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
04-May-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
20-Apr-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
20-Mar-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
05-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
02-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
26-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
20-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
16-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2026
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Application No. 87/2026 (Ramdas Ghavate v. Ramdas Salke & Others) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction is ALLOWED. The court granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction, restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the rented property, preventing sale/transfer of the property, and restraining harassment. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting the relief. Costs of the application absorbed in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts