Sunil Pandurang Londhe vs Pandurang Amrita Londhe — 48/2026

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH250001732026

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

54/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

48/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner

Judge

5-Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6
Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Pandurang Londhe

    Adv. AUTI AMOL PRATAPRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pandurang Amrita Londhe

  2. 2.Anil Pandurang Londhe

  3. 3.Sharad Pandurang Londhe

  4. 4.Vatsala Pandurang Londhe

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court decreed a partition suit in RCS No. 48/2026 based on an amicable settlement reached through mediation between the plaintiff and defendant. The court ordered the decree to be prepared in terms of the compromise agreement (Exh. 14), with the compromise and any relevant map forming part of the decree, and directed refund of court fees as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd And JMFC

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed a partition suit in RCS No. 48/2026 based on an amicable settlement reached through mediation between the plaintiff and defendant. The court ordered the decree to be prepared in terms of the compromise agreement (Exh. 14), with the compromise and any relevant map forming part of the decree, and directed refund of court fees as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case