The State of Mahrashtra vs Santosh Sahebrao Pawar — 16/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH250000462022
e-Filing Number
23-11-2021
Filing Number
22/2022
Filing Date
11-01-2022
Registration No
16/2022
Registration Date
12-01-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Parner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
314
Police Station
SUPA POLIC STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Mahrashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Santosh Sahebrao Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Parner
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 29-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 29-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 29-11-2024 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 29-06-2024 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged accused Santosh Sahebrao Pawar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for violation of Section 65-E of the Bombay Prohibition Act, as the prosecution failed to file the mandatory chemical analysis report despite multiple opportunities, making it impossible to prove possession of the prohibited article. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled, and the seized liquor was ordered to be disposed of by the Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged accused Santosh Sahebrao Pawar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for violation of Section 65-E of the Bombay Prohibition Act, as the prosecution failed to file the mandatory chemical analysis report despite multiple opportunities, making it impossible to prove possession of the prohibited article. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled, and the seized liquor was ordered to be disposed of by the Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts