Mahendra Nana Navale vs Vilas Gungaji Dhalavade Advocate - Siddhesh Surendra Katariya — 211/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH230038772020

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

454/2020

Filing Date

19-09-2020

Registration No

211/2020

Registration Date

21-09-2020

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

2-Jt CJJD and JMFC Shrigonda

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Mahendra Nana Navale

Adv. Bhos S. K.

Respondent(s)

Vilas Gungaji Dhalavade Advocate - Siddhesh Surendra Katariya

Sandip Gungaji Dhalvade(Legal Heir) 2.

Priyanka Avdhoot Kasare alias Priyanka Sandip Dhalwade

Vidhya Vilas Dhalavade

Jyoti Sandip Dhalavade

Nandini Gungaji Dhalavade

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt CJJD and JMFC Shrigonda

09-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

04-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

22-01-2026

Amended Plaint

08-12-2025

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The petition filed under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 for correction of the defendant's name in the case record was allowed. The court permitted the correction of Respondent No. 2's name from "Priyanka Avdhut Kasare" to "Priyanka Avdhut Kasare alias Priyanka Sandeep Dhalwade" as it was a technical/clerical error, and the correction would not affect the substantive nature of the original case. The petitioner was directed to complete the correction by the next date of hearing, and the costs were imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 for correction of the defendant's name in the case record was allowed. The court permitted the correction of Respondent No. 2's name from "Priyanka Avdhut Kasare" to "Priyanka Avdhut Kasare alias Priyanka Sandeep Dhalwade" as it was a technical/clerical error, and the correction would not affect the substantive nature of the original case. The petitioner was directed to complete the correction by the next date of hearing, and the costs were imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case