Ahilyabai Ramdas Kshirsagar vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Collector Advocate - Nagwade V. H. — 146/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHAH230009382023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
12-10-2023
Filing Number
912/2023
Filing Date
16-10-2023
Registration No
146/2023
Registration Date
21-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ahilyabai Ramdas Kshirsagar
Adv. Gawali N. D.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr. Collector Advocate - Nagwade V. H.
Sub Divisional Officer
Tahsildar Saheb
Circle Officer Saheb Part Pedgaon
Talathi Saheb Ajnuj
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 10-12-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 25-09-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 15-07-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 22-04-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the revenue authorities from proceeding with recovery proceedings against the plaintiff, Ahilyabai Ramdas Kshirsagar, and her land (Gut No. 413, 49-R) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case against the Tehsildar's order dated 15/11/2021 demanding recovery of Rs. 94,32,000 as royalty and penalty, noting procedural irregularities including an unsigned panchnama and discrepancies in property identification between orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the revenue authorities from proceeding with recovery proceedings against the plaintiff, Ahilyabai Ramdas Kshirsagar, and her land (Gut No. 413, 49-R) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case against the Tehsildar's order dated 15/11/2021 demanding recovery of Rs. 94,32,000 as royalty and penalty, noting procedural irregularities including an unsigned panchnama and discrepancies in property identification between orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts