Pradipkumar Ramchandra Dahale vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Collector Advocate - Nagwade V.H. — 328/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: No W.S. Order. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230008902023
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
21-09-2023
Filing Number
864/2023
Filing Date
30-09-2023
Registration No
328/2023
Registration Date
30-09-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pradipkumar Ramchandra Dahale
Adv. Pathan A. G.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr. Collector Advocate - Nagwade V.H.
Tahsildar Sahab Shrigonda
Adv. Nagwade V.H.
Mukhya Adhikari Shrigonda Nagar Parishad Shrigonda
Adv. Fate P. J.
Sanjay Ramchandra Dahale
Adv. Bhoyate A. S.
Rajendra Ramchandra Dahale
Adv. Bhoyate A. S.
Chhaya Sudhakar Bhamburdekar
Archana Umesh Mundalik
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
No W.S. Order
No W.S. Order
No W.S. Order
No W.S. Order
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | No W.S. Order | |
| 23-01-2026 | No W.S. Order | |
| 09-12-2025 | No W.S. Order | |
| 19-11-2025 | No W.S. Order | |
| 28-10-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 328/2023, the court partially allowed the plaintiff's petition for amendment/rectification. The court ordered that the petition be amended to add necessary parties (Defendants 4-7) to the suit concerning a disputed property (0.02 acres) from Survey No. 1939, and directed the plaintiff to file the corrected suit within the stipulated timeframe. The court dismissed the petition against Defendants 1-3 as lacking proper legal grounds, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 328/2023, the court partially allowed the plaintiff's petition for amendment/rectification. The court ordered that the petition be amended to add necessary parties (Defendants 4-7) to the suit concerning a disputed property (0.02 acres) from Survey No. 1939, and directed the plaintiff to file the corrected suit within the stipulated timeframe. The court dismissed the petition against Defendants 1-3 as lacking proper legal grounds, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts