Bapu Baba Mane vs Santosh Manik Bhondawe — 345/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH230008872021

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

725/2021

Filing Date

21-10-2021

Registration No

345/2021

Registration Date

21-10-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

2-Jt CJJD and JMFC Shrigonda

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Bapu Baba Mane

Adv. Borude S. D.

Respondent(s)

Santosh Manik Bhondawe

Ravindra Gajanan Bhondawe

Rajendra Gajanan Bhondawe

Sachin Pandurang Bhondawe

Akshay Sambhaji Suryavanshi

Bapu Laxman Suryavanshi

Yashwant Radhu Ohol

Ramesh Radhu Ohol

Sushila Kisan Nikalje

Kaushalya Barik Thokale

Sunita Prabhakar Sabale

Indubai Radhu Ohol

Satish Gautam Ohol

Sanjay Gautam Ohol

Smita Gautam Ohol

Mankabai Gautam Ohol

Vilas Jayvant Ohol

Ashok Jayvant Ohol

Arun Jayvant Ohol

Shakuntala Baban Thorat

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt CJJD and JMFC Shrigonda

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

14-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

25-11-2025

Additional W.S.

07-10-2025

Additional W.S.

Interim Orders

07-10-2022
Order on T.I.
29-02-2024
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in this perpetual injunction suit. The amendment was necessary to include information about a property sale deed (dated 08-11-2021) executed by defendants after the suit was filed, which would help determine the real dispute between parties and prevent multiplicity of litigation. The defendants will have the opportunity to file their defence after the amended plaint is submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in this perpetual injunction suit. The amendment was necessary to include information about a property sale deed (dated 08-11-2021) executed by defendants after the suit was filed, which would help determine the real dispute between parties and prevent multiplicity of litigation. The defendants will have the opportunity to file their defence after the amended plaint is submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case