Ananda Ramchandra Mohare vs Popat Maruti Sake Advocate - Acharya R. K. — 355/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230008322017
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
850/2017
Filing Date
08-12-2017
Registration No
355/2017
Registration Date
14-12-2017
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ananda Ramchandra Mohare
Adv. Bhoyate D. A.
Dattatray Ramchandra Mohare
Adv. Bhoyate D. A.
Harichandra Ramchandra Mohare
Adv. Bhoyate D. A.
Sarjerao Ramchandra Mohare
Adv. Bhoyate D. A.
Respondent(s)
Popat Maruti Sake Advocate - Acharya R. K.
Bacchu Maruti Sake
Suman Sopan Darkunde
Kamal Tatyabhau Diwate
Lalasaheb Bhausaheb Pansare
Arjun Ramchandra Mohare
Adv. Acharya R. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 24-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 08-07-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 29-04-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendants No. 1-3 to set aside the "No Written Statement" (No W.S.) order passed against them is allowed. The court found that the defendants' failure to file their written statement within the limitation period was due to non-availability of important documents, and in the interest of justice and principles of natural justice, they should be given an opportunity to contest the suit on merits. The No W.S. order is set aside subject to the defendants paying costs of Rs. 500 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendants No. 1-3 to set aside the "No Written Statement" (No W.S.) order passed against them is allowed. The court found that the defendants' failure to file their written statement within the limitation period was due to non-availability of important documents, and in the interest of justice and principles of natural justice, they should be given an opportunity to contest the suit on merits. The No W.S. order is set aside subject to the defendants paying costs of Rs. 500 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts