Dattatrya Dinkar Ghodake vs Baban Dagdu Ghodake — 316/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 09th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH230007642024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-11-2024

Filing Number

611/2024

Filing Date

26-11-2024

Registration No

316/2024

Registration Date

29-11-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

10-2nd Jt CJJD JMFC Shrigonda

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,
HINDU SUCCESSION ACT Section 6,8,

Petitioner(s)

Dattatrya Dinkar Ghodake

Adv. Adv Gokul Vilas Satpute

Ashabai Dinkar Ghodake

Adv. Adv Gokul Vilas Satpute

Vaishali Shankar Gore

Adv. Adv Gokul Vilas Satpute

Minabai Angad Kale

Adv. Adv Gokul Vilas Satpute

Shakuntala Prashant Kumbhar

Adv. Adv Gokul Vilas Satpute

Janabai Dinkar Ghodake

Adv. Adv Gokul Vilas Satpute

Respondent(s)

Baban Dagdu Ghodake

Subhash Vasant Pathare

Sunita Balkrushna Puri

Hearing History

Judge: 10-2nd Jt CJJD JMFC Shrigonda

09-03-2026

Disposed

09-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

05-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

01-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

27-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court disposed of R.C.S. No.316/2024 as a compromise settlement after the plaintiff and defendants jointly filed compromise terms (Exh.49), which were admitted by all parties. The court ordered the suit to be disposed of as compromise, directed refund of court fees as per rules, and decreed that a formal decree be drawn up in accordance with the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of R.C.S. No.316/2024 as a compromise settlement after the plaintiff and defendants jointly filed compromise terms (Exh.49), which were admitted by all parties. The court ordered the suit to be disposed of as compromise, directed refund of court fees as per rules, and decreed that a formal decree be drawn up in accordance with the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case