Machindra Kisan Bhade vs Tukaram Dattatray Bhade Advocate - Mandage Dattatray T. — 2000017/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230007502014
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2000017/2011
Filing Date
23-01-2014
Registration No
2000017/2011
Registration Date
19-01-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Machindra Kisan Bhade
Adv. Borude S. D.
Raghunath Kisan Bhade
Adv. Borude S. D.
Mohan Kisan Bhade
Adv. Borude S. D.
Ajinath Sakharam Bhade
Adv. Borude S. D.
Balu Sakharam Bhade
Adv. Borude S. D.
Santosh Sakharam Bhade
Adv. Borude S. D.
Saraswati @ Rakhmabai Sakharam Bhade
Adv. Borude S. D.
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Dattatray Bhade Advocate - Mandage Dattatray T.
Pandurang Dattatray Bhade
Kerba Dattatray Bhade
Adv. Mandage D. T.
Arjun Dattatray Bhade
Adv. Mandge DT
Bhima Dattatray Bhade
Adv. Mandge DT
Lahanubai Kisan Bhade
Shantabai Murlidhar Shende
Girjabai Anna Khamkar
Devubai Kisan Doke
Gena Aappa Bhade
Tatya Aappa Bhade
Bhanudas Zumbar Bhade
Sopan Zumbar Bhade
Baban Zumbar Bhade
Popat Zumbar Bhade
Rajaram Zumbar Bhade
Chandrakant Zumbar Bhade
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 01-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 19-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this partition suit (RCS 17/2011), the court allowed the plaintiffs' application for condonation of delay in substituting legal representatives of three deceased defendants on record. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, as the defendants died between October 2020 and July 2023, and the application was filed in November 2023—beyond the 90-day statutory period under Article 120 of the Limitation Act. No costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this partition suit (RCS 17/2011), the court allowed the plaintiffs' application for condonation of delay in substituting legal representatives of three deceased defendants on record. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, as the defendants died between October 2020 and July 2023, and the application was filed in November 2023—beyond the 90-day statutory period under Article 120 of the Limitation Act. No costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts